Knowledge of and Attitude towards Domestic Violence among Married Teachers in Primary Schools in Borno State, Nigeria
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude of married public and private school teachers towards domestic violence (DV) in Borno State, Maiduguri, Nigeria. To determine this knowledge and attitude, two objectives were raised and two null hypotheses were answered. A cross-sectional research design was used for this study. The population and sample of this study consist of both private and public primary school teachers in Maiduguri. A convenience sample was used to select 185 teachers in public schools and 185 teachers in private schools making a total of 370. The instrument used to collect data for this study was adopted from previous studies named Knowledge and Attitude of Married Teachers towards Domestic Violence in Borno State, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Descriptive statistics of frequency counts and percentages were used to analyze the demographic information of the respondents, mean and standard deviation were used for the research questions while inferential statistics of independent sampled t-tests were used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The result indicated that there is no significant difference in knowledge and attitude of married public and private school teachers in Borno State, Maiduguri on DV based on gender (p > 0.05). It was concluded that married teachers in public and private primary schools in Maiduguri have good knowledge of DV as a result of having a positive attitude towards DV. It was recommended that the good knowledge of DV demonstrated by these primary school teachers should be used to educate other married men and women in various communities on the need to avoid domestic violence so as to have a peaceful environment at home.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed A, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Siemienuk RA, Krentz HB, Gish JA, Gill MJ. Domestic violence screening: prevalence and outcomes in a Canadian HIV population. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2010;24(12):763-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2010.0235
National Coalition against Domestic Violence. Domestic Violence Awareness Month. 2023. Available from: https://ncadv.org/
Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241593512
Governor Lagos State of Nigeria. A law to provide protection against domestic violence and for connected purposes. Accessed 2020 May 25. Available from: https://lagosstatemoj.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/PROTECTION-AGAINST-DOMESTIC-VIOLENCE-LAW-2007.pdf
Mgbada JU. Introduction to Agricultural Extension: Human Development Perspective. Enugu, Nigeria: New Edge; 2010.
Holine. Marital conflict. Retrieved on 1/5/2017.
Najwa IA, Tareq AD, Shaimaa MA, Medhat E, Mohamed IK. Knowledge and perception of domestic violence among primary care physicians and nurses: A comparative study. Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine. 2012;48:83-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2011.07.014
Balogun MO, John-Akinola YO. A qualitative study of intimate partner violence among women in Nigeria. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30:2410-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553112
Nmadu AG, Jafaru A, Dahiru T, Joshua AI, Nwankwo B, Mohammed-Durosinlorun A. Cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitude and prevalence of domestic violence among women in Kaduna, north western Nigeria. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e051626. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051626
Blideman A. Nursing students' attitudes towards domestic violence: A quantitative study at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania. 2010. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A413249&dswid=-1911
Arora S, Rege S, Bhate-Deosthali P, Thwin SS, Amin A, García-Moreno C, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care providers trained in responding to violence against women: a pre- and post-intervention study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1973. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12042-7
Ogbalu AI, Frances NI, Onyinyechukwu NN. Forms and risk factors of domestic violence among married secondary school teachers in Anambra State. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20211010
Ashimolowo OR, Otufale GA. Assessment of domestic violence among women in Ogun State, Nigeria. Greener J Soc Sci. 2012;2(3):102-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2012.3.GJSS1223
Loi VM, Ios VT, Ios NHM, Clement J. Gender-based violence: The case of Vietnam. World Bank Policy Research Report on Gender Development. 1999;1-24. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/876861468761727749/gender-based-violence-the-case-of-vietnam
Population Council. Child Marriage Briefing: Nigeria. 2004. Date accessed 22/04/06.
Koenig MA, Lutalo T, Zhao F, Nalugoda F, Wabwire-Mangen F, Kiwanuka N, et al. Domestic violence in rural Uganda: evidence from a community-based study. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(1):53-60. Epub 2003 Mar 11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12640477/
Ramsay J, Rutterford C, Gregory A, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Sharp D, et al. Domestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(602):e647-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12x654623
Sánchez-Prada A, Delgado-Álvarez C, Bosch-Fiol E, Ferreiro-Basurto V, Ferrer-Perez VA. Measurement of supportive attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women among a Spanish-speaker sample. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0241392. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241392