Successful double valve replacement in a pregnant woman with refractory heart failure due to early dysfunction of the biological prosthesis in the aortic valve position
Main Article Content
Abstract
Rheumatic fever continues to be a frequent cause of cardiac valve disease in developing countries. The combination of rheumatic heart disease and pregnancy represents a challenge in the management of these patients. Prevention strategies are often insufficient; this is why we continue to observe complicated cases that demand more complex treatments. We are reporting the case of a 20-year-old woman, with a history of aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair due to rheumatic heart disease. Two years later after her valve replacement, she attended consultation with signs and symptoms of heart failure in functional class III during a pregnancy of 20 weeks. The echocardiography showed: dysfunctional biological aortic prosthesis with severe stenosis and moderate regurgitation (central and para-valve leak), as well as severe mitral valve insufficiency, eccentric, directed towards the atrial free wall. She was admitted, and received optimal medical treatment for 4 weeks with little response and subsequent worsening. A multidisciplinary committee was formed including cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, obstetricians, neonatologists, and specialists in bioethics. It was decided to proceed with valve replacement surgery during the 21st week of her gestation. Successful double valve replacement (mitral and aortic) was performed, without complications for the patient or the fetus. She was discharged in good health. In her 38th week of gestation, a successful cesarean delivery was performed without any complications.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2019 Candia JC, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M (2005) The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 685-694. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yxwj8aoc
Watkins DA, Sebitloane M, Engel ME, Mayosi BM (2012) The burden of antenatal heart disease in South Africa: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 12: 23. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y2mwar2a
Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S (1998) Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic changes in early human pregnancy. Kidney Int 54: 2056-2063. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yxz9d6vs
Hameed A, Karaalp IS, Tummala PP (2001) The effect of valvular heart disease on maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 893-899. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y35mtrxj
Thorne S, MacGregor A, Nelson-Piercy C (2006) Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart 92: 1520-1525. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yxuqw9v9
Badduke BR, Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT (1991) Pregnancy and childbearing in a population with biologic valvular prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 102: 179-186. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y68pebw9
Nitsche C, Kammerlander AA, Knechtelsdorfer K, Kraiger JA, Goliasch G, et al. (2019) Determinants of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging pii: S1936-878X(19)30165-2. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yysypsmw
Weiss BM, von Segesser LK, Alon E (1998) Outcome of cardiovascular surgery and pregnancy: a systematic review of the period 1984-1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179: 1643-1653. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yyox8vsd
Maskell P, Burgess M, MacCarthy-Ofosu B, Harky A (2019) Management of aortic valve disease during pregnancy: A review. J Card Surg 34: 239-249. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y4xsoacr
Dayan V, Arocena MJ, Fernandez A, Silva E, Zerpa DP (2019) Previous Cardiac Surgery: a Predictor of Mortality in Aortic Valve Replacement? Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 34: 173-178. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yy8y646f
Rea CW, Wang TKM, Ruygrok PN, Sidhu K, Ramanathan T, et al. (2019) Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Discussed by the Multidisciplinary "Heart Team" According to Treatment Allocation. Heart Lung Circ pii: S1443-9506(19)30273-2. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y2bezvwt