An unusual case of foreign body aspiration

Main Article Content

Vanitha Palanisamy*
Sia Kian Joo
Chong Aun Wee
Mohd Afiq Mohd Amin
Shahrul Amry Hashim
Ng Syiao Wei

Abstract

Tracheo-Oesophageal Puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis insertion is considered as a gold standard among various voice rehabilitation procedures in laryngectomized patients. It is easily reversible with a high success rate, and the speech, which closely resembles laryngeal speech, develops faster than esophageal speech. However the prosthesis has to be cleaned regularly to ensure proper function as well as longevity of the voice prosthesis valve system. There are not many incidents of the voice prosthesis cleaning brush reported, as the cleaning brush is made to be durable and able to withstand repetitive usage. Hereby we describe an unusual case of a laryngectomized patient who had aspirated a broken tip of a cleaning brush while cleaning his voice prosthesis. The delay in removal of the aspirated foreign body due to technical difficulty had led to lung collapse subjecting the patient to partial lobectomy. We would like to highlight several aspects in this case report, firstly patients should be counselled regarding the proper techniques to clean the voice prosthesis and they should be vigilant during the cleaning process to prevent aspiration in case of accidental broken of cleaning brush. Secondly the incident should be reported to the manufacturer so that the durability of the cleaning brush is reviewed and improvised. Lastly, prompt management of foreign body aspiration should be implied to prevent complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Palanisamy, V., Joo, S. K., Wee, C. A., Amin, M. A. M., Hashim, S. A., & Wei, N. S. (2021). An unusual case of foreign body aspiration. Global Journal of Medical and Clinical Case Reports, 8(2), 072–075. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5282.000133
Case Reports

Copyright (c) 2021 Palanisamy V, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Bozec A, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E, Demard F, Santini J, et al. (2010) Results of vocal rehabilitation using tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and their predictive factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267: 751–758. Link: https://bit.ly/2WtQAnr

Hotz MA, Baumann A, Schaller I, Zbären P (2002) Success and Predictability of Provox Prosthesis Voice Rehabilitation. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 128: 687-691. Link: https://bit.ly/2UZhBPd

Singer MI, Blom ED (1980) An Endoscopic Technique for Restoration of Voice after Laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89: 529-533. Link: https://bit.ly/3f2Tq9g

Kazi R, Rhys-Evans P, Harrington K, Dwivedi CR (2012) Issues in Head and Neck Cancer. 1st ed. Byword Books Private Limited.

Banerjee A, Rao KS, Khanna SK, Narayanant PS, Gupta BK, et al. (1988) Laryngo-tracheo-bronchial foreign bodies in children. J Laryngol Otol 102: 1029-1032. Link: https://bit.ly/3l5KyDS

Kramer TA, Riding KH, Salkeld LJ (1986) Tracheobronchial and esophageal foreign bodies in the pediatric population. J Otolaryngol 15: 355-358. https://bit.ly/3BODG3n

Mantel K, Butenandt I (1986) Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in childhood: A report on 224 cases. Eur J Pediatr 145: 211-216. Link: https://bit.ly/3yfqfHG

Mani N, Soma M, Massey S, Albert D, Bailey CM (2009) Removal of inhaled foreign bodies—Middle of the night or the next morning? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73: 1085-1059. Link: https://bit.ly/2WvjmnG

Kishore A, Roy D (2001) Inhaled foreign bodies in laryngectomees. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 53: 315-317. Link: https://bit.ly/3zOixVt

Conte SC, De Nardi E, Conte F, Nardini S (2012) Aspiration of tracheoesophageal prosthesis in a laryngectomized patient. Multidiscip Respir Med 7: 25. Link: https://bit.ly/3BKTEMd

Loo CM, Hsu AA, Eng P, Ong YY (1998) Case Series of Bronchoscopic Removal of Tracheobronchial Foreign Body in Six Adults. Ann Acad Med Singap 27: 849-853. Link: https://bit.ly/3zKuT0Q

Pawar P, Sayed S, Kazi R, Jagade MV (2008) Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy. J Cancer Res Ther 4: 186-191. Link: https://bit.ly/3748fnw

Yenigun A, Eren SB, Ozkul MH, Tugrul S, Meric A (2015) Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses. Singapore Med J 56: 632–636. Link: https://bit.ly/3l5Lnws

Wolkove N, Kreisman H, Cohen C, Frank H (1982) Occult foreign-body aspiration in adults. JAMA 248: 1350-1352. Link: https://bit.ly/3rCahVE

Lan RS, Lee CH, Chiang YC, Wang WJ (1989) Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy to Retrieve Bronchial Foreign Bodies in Adults. Am Rev Respir Dis 140: 1734-1347. Link: https://bit.ly/374UwNt

Limper AH, Prakash UB (1990) Tracheobronchial Foreign Bodies in Adults. Ann Intern Med 112: 604-609. Link: https://bit.ly/2WyHGoR