Anatomical evaluation of the craniometric points and dimensions among adult’s populations of the South-Eastern Nigerians and its implication for intracranial surgical procedures

Main Article Content

David Lekpa Kingdom
Vidona Willy Barinem*

Abstract

Background: The understanding of Craniometry with its associated craniometric points and dimensions have found immense applicable relevance in anthropology and neuroscience, ranging from growth determination, estimation of cranial deformities, personal biological profile identification and facial reconstructive surgeries, analysis of evolution of the human species in archeology as well as age variations.


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the craniometric dimensions among adults’ subjects in Eastern Nigerian State.


Methods: Research data was collected from Computed Tomography scans in the Radiological Department of Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Nigeria with strict adherence to inclusive and exclusive factors. A total number of 150 human CT scans were used in the findings. Craniometric parameters were calculated - derived from the two and three coordinate points for linear and angular measurements respectively.


Results: Results revealed that age group 36-45 had the lowest cranial parameters and age group 56-65 had the highest cranial parameters.


Conclusion: It was concluded that cranial parameters does not increase as age increases throughout life. The study findings will be useful to the anatomists, anthropologists and neuroscientists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Kingdom, D. L., & Barinem, V. W. (2021). Anatomical evaluation of the craniometric points and dimensions among adult’s populations of the South-Eastern Nigerians and its implication for intracranial surgical procedures. Global Journal of Medical and Clinical Case Reports, 8(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5282.000143
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2021 David LK, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, Acharya J (2014) A Study of Cranial Variations Based on Craniometric Indices in a South Indian Population. J Craniofac Surg 25: 1645-1649. Link: https://bit.ly/3GlOKrc

Christensen AM, Crowder CM (2009) Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 54: 1211-1216. Link: https://bit.ly/3GmLpZ2

Golalipour MJ, Haidari K, Jahanshahi M, Frahani MR (2006) The shapes of head and face in normal male newborns in South-East of Caspian Sea (Iran-Gorgan). Anatomy Society India 52: 28-31. Link: https://bit.ly/3EedTSM

Coon CS (1971) A fossilized human mandibular fragment from Kangatotha, Kenya, East Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol 34: 157-163. Link: https://bit.ly/3EkxsZQ

Haack DC, Meihoff EC (1971) A method for estimation of cranial capacity from cephalometric Roentgenograms. Am J Phys Anthropol 34: 447-452. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZgHVGh

Stephan CN, Simpson EK (2008) Facial soft tissue depths in craniofacial identification (part I): an analytical review of the published adult data. J Forensic Sci 53:1257-1272. Link: https://bit.ly/3nr7ay9

Stewart RF, Edgar H, Tatlock C, Kroth PJ (2008) Developing a standardized cephalometric vocabulary: choices and possible strategies. J Dent Educ 72: 989–997. Link: https://bit.ly/3jCBGnH

Tyebkahan G (2003) Declaration of Helsinki. The ethical cornerstone of human clinical research. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 69: 245-247. Link: https://bit.ly/3GnZrt5

Shah GV, Jadhav HR (2004) The study of cephalic index in students of Gujarat. Journal of Anatomy Society India 53: 25-26. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZzcTK6

Vidona WB, Oviosun A, David LK (2021) Craniometry Patterns of Nigerians and its correlation with chronological age. Journal of Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Biology 9: 212. Link: https://bit.ly/3pHzTkT

Ramamoorthy B, Pai MM, Prabhu LV, Muralimanju BV, Rai R (2016) Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination. J Forensic Leg Med 37: 8-14. Link: https://bit.ly/3Eiq80w

Leaky LSB (1935) The Stone Age races of Kenya. (1st Edition). Oxford University Press, London. 150. Link: https://bit.ly/3pDJKbt

Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM (1992) Anthropometric growth study of the head. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 29: 303-308. Link: https://bit.ly/3vITt1j

Hiernaux J (1968) Bantu expansion: the evidence from physical anthropology confronted with linguistic and archaeological evidence. Journal of African History 9: 505-515. Link: https://bit.ly/3CkJX6T